Comments on: Maxim’s “unsexiest Women Alive” List: Tacky Or Funny?

By: Mike T

Mike T — Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:21:29 +0000

The truth ain’t pretty. The reality is that women will NEVER BE JUDGED BY THEIR PERSONALITY ALONE and thats just how it is.
Men are judged just as unfairly as women.. only its different criteria thats under fire.
Sarah Jessica Parker looks like a hawk and should be on a Fruit Loops box.. not on a TV show. But thats just my opinion.
Women want to be judged by their personalities? TOUGH!!! Ain’t gonna happen.. NEVER.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:27:13 +0000

As a woman, I find it funny. I don’t understand why the women in this section get so upset about it.

By: Cletus the Slack-Jawed Yokel

Cletus the Slack-Jawed Yokel — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:42:51 +0000

It’s funny. If she didn’t want to be criticized then she shouldn’t have become famous.

By: I'm Not Your Friend, Buddy

I'm Not Your Friend, Buddy — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 10:43:33 +0000

I think it’s funny. She really doesn’t look that good. How did she get to star in that show? Did they even try to find good looking women? The only good looking one was that brunette. It’s a men’s magazine, nobody wants to read about personality contests. Doesn’t matter, the magazine is pretty big, so I think America is speaking for itself. It’s funny.

By: hooyutoo

hooyutoo — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 07:51:39 +0000

I’ve never even heard of a mag called , “Maxim” but that is pretty damned insensitive/cruel. Celebrities may get calloused to notoriety but no one ever gets immune to insulting cruelty. personally I’ve always thought that she may not have a natural beauty (like Princess Grace Kelly) that she has a charismatic magnetism. But regardless one might be tempted to berate things that person can change about themselves (dress/ fashion etc) one should never berate things that are nature (appearance) and are beyond our control.

By: mutterha

mutterha — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:59:44 +0000

Given that it’s Maxim, which is pretty lowbrow, I find it funny. However, I would not find it so funny were I Sarah Jessica Parker. Someone should do a list for men, that would be funny too. My entry: Zac Efron.
Edit: Oh, hell yes, he’s about as sexy as a herpes outbreak…

By: Done

Done — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 00:13:48 +0000

Well – consider the stupid source – Maxim. It’s not like there is a high-intelligence factor going into the making of this magazine.
It is tacky and mean, but we are talking about the male equivalent to Cosmo, which is an asinine women’s magazine.

By: Still Sexy, Still Shane!

Still Sexy, Still Shane! — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:52:00 +0000

Maxim is gonna so get sued.
Sarah Jessica Parker doesn’t look like a horse…..

By: RoVale

RoVale — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:43:59 +0000

Mike T, the reason Sarah Jessica Parker is on a TV show is because she CAN act. I would much rather see a less attractive woman who can act than some silicon inflated starlet who only seems to be reading her lines from a cue card. She got to where she is not from her looks but from talent and hard work. I find that much more admirable than someone who thinks that getting gobs of plastic surgery will somehow give her talent and make her a huge star. Those women are a dime-a-dozen. Go watch “Girls Gone Wild” and see stupid young women who actually believe that getting drunk and acting like idiots will somehow get them into a major singing and acting career. It hasn’t worked for Ashley Alexander Dupree, now has it?

By: Rio Madeira

Rio Madeira — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:01:19 +0000

Like everything else Maxim has ever produced, tacky. Lists of the most attractive women are sexist enough.